Knight-Georgetown Institute Logo

Search

Menu

Commentary /

Navigating the Evolving Social Media Landscape and What’s to Come: From Platform Design to Litigation that Protects Users Online

This month, the Knight-Georgetown Institute convened two events during Georgetown University’s fourth annual Tech & Society Week. KGI brought together leading experts, academics, and other key stakeholders across the digital technology landscape to explore some of the most pressing topics around social media platform design as well as consumer protection litigation aimed at keeping users safe online.

As evidence and empirical studies increasingly highlight the link between social media and a range of health impacts, our Tech & Society Week panel “The Rise of Consumer Protection Claims Against Digital Platforms” underscored the importance of litigation in addressing health and safety harms impacting social media users, including minors. 

KGI’s Peter Chapman facilitated the discussion with experts including Meetali Jain (Tech Justice Law Project), Meg Leta Jones (Georgetown University), Matthew Lawrence (Emory University), and S. Bryn Austin (Harvard University), and discussed how the social media litigation landscape may evolve in the years ahead, with lawyers and judges playing an increasingly central role in the regulation of social media in the US and beyond.

The last five years have witnessed profound changes to the social media ecosystem. These include the rise of decentralized platforms like Threads and Bluesky, and platforms such as TikTok and Instagram turning to hyper-personalized algorithmic recommendations. 

Our second panel “Reckoning with the Evolving Social Media Landscape” noted the significance of these industry-wide shifts and grappled with what they mean for policy and regulation moving forward. KGI’s Zander Arnao facilitated the discussion with experts including Renée DiResta (Georgetown University), Sean Martin McDonald (Digital Public), Samantha Lai (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace), and Prithvi Iyer (Tech Policy Press) – with the panel discussing how to mitigate harms linked to social media platform design, as well as exploring the risks and opportunities posed by new design trends.

[Photo: KGI panel “The Rise of Consumer Protection Claims Against Digital Platforms”. From Left to Right: Peter Chapman (KGI), Meetali Jain (Tech Justice Law Project), S. Bryn Austin (Harvard University). Photo credit: Laurie DeWitt/Pure Light Images]

 

Join our email list to stay up-to-date with the latest from KGI.

Related Work

Better Feeds: Algorithms That Put People First

Report /

Better Feeds: Algorithms That Put People First

As state, federal, and global policymakers grapple with how to address concerns about the link between online algorithms and a variety of harms, KGI’s latest report authored by a distinguished group of researchers, technologists, and policy leaders is a roadmap for design and governance solutions that put users first. Product designers and policymakers can promote better algorithms through detailed design transparency, user choices and defaults, and assessments of long-term impact.

Alex Moehring, Alissa Cooper, Arvind Narayanan, Aviv Ovadya, Elissa Redmiles, Jeff Allen, Jonathan Stray, Julia Kamin, Leif Sigerson, Luke Thorburn, Matt Motyl, Motahhare Eslami, Nadine Farid Johnson, Nathaniel Lubin, Ravi Iyer, Zander Arnao

Ofcom Call for Evidence: Researchers’ access to information from regulated online services

Commentary /

Ofcom Call for Evidence: Researchers’ access to information from regulated online services

The Knight-Georgetown Institute (KGI) submitted comments to the United Kingdom regulator for communications services’ (Ofcom) call for evidence on researcher access to information from digital platforms. KGI’s comments highlight barriers to independent research and practical steps that Ofcom can take to strengthen access to data and independent research in the online information ecosystem.

Leticia Bode, Peter Chapman

Advancing Platform Accountability: The Promise and Perils of DSA Risk Assessments

Commentary /

Advancing Platform Accountability: The Promise and Perils of DSA Risk Assessments

Late last year, the public got its first glimpse into one of the EU Digital Services Act’s (DSA) key governance tools. Nineteen designated Very Large Online Platforms and Search Engines (VLOPs and VLOSEs) published systemic risk assessment and audit reports focusing on platform risks and mitigation measures.

The DSA’s required risk assessments and audits create the possibility to advance groundbreaking platform transparency and accountability, but this first round falls far short of realizing that potential.

Peter Chapman

Close