Research & Commentary

Issue

Type

3 results for:
US v. Google Amicus Brief: How Better Remedies Can Restore Competition

Brief /

US v. Google Amicus Brief: How Better Remedies Can Restore Competition

The appeals in the United States v. Google search case hinge on a fundamental question: do the District Court’s remedies address the anticompetitive conduct that maintained Google’s search monopoly, or do they leave the market largely unchanged? Eight leading economists, legal experts, and technologists argue in an amicus brief that better remedies exist to help restore meaningful competition.

Age Assurance Rules: An Implementation Guide

Brief /

Age Assurance Rules: An Implementation Guide

KGI’s Age Assurance Rules provides practical recommendations for designing age assurance rules that support youth online safety while appropriately accounting for tradeoffs involving privacy, service availability, competition, and openness.

Amy Winecoff, Alissa Cooper

Assigning Responsibility for Age Assurance: Recommendations for Youth Online Safety

Brief /

Assigning Responsibility for Age Assurance: Recommendations for Youth Online Safety

KGI’s Assigning Responsibility for Age Assurance examines how policymakers can allocate responsibility for age assurance across the digital ecosystem. It provides practical recommendations for assigning age assurance obligations in ways that support youth online safety while appropriately accounting for tradeoffs involving privacy, competition, accessibility, and openness.

Amy Winecoff, Alissa Cooper

Close