Research & Commentary

Issue

Type

41 results for:
Designing Europe’s Search Data Sharing Rules for Competition in the AI Era

Commentary /

Designing Europe’s Search Data Sharing Rules for Competition in the AI Era

As the European Commission advances efforts under the Digital Markets Act to require Google to share its search data with competitors, lessons from historic antitrust remedies underscore how data access could be transformational in the AI-powered search market. While the Commission’s proposals represent a novel and comprehensive approach, key improvements to data scope and sharing frequency, privacy protections, and dispute resolution are needed. US courts and enforcers charged with implementing similar provisions should take note.

Alissa Cooper, Zander Arnao

Tracking Tech-Related Litigation

Commentary /

Tracking Tech-Related Litigation

As lawsuits involving AI, social media, privacy, competition, and platform accountability expand worldwide, courts are emerging as central actors shaping technology governance. A new tech litigation tracker developed by the Knight-Georgetown Institute, Tech Justice Law, and Georgetown University’s Communication, Culture & Technology program centralizes and tracks technology-related litigation and regulatory actions across jurisdictions and issue areas.

Designing Technology Remedies: Lessons for Social Media and Generative AI Chatbot Litigation

Report /

Designing Technology Remedies: Lessons for Social Media and Generative AI Chatbot Litigation

As social media and generative AI chatbot lawsuits in the United States proceed to discovery and trial, courts are emerging as central actors in shaping technology governance, platform accountability, and online safety. A new report by the Knight-Georgetown Institute, Tech Justice Law, and the USC Marshall School Neely Center provides a practical, evidence-based framework to help courts, litigators, and policymakers craft effective and enforceable remedies for harms associated with social media platforms and AI chatbots.

Peter Chapman, Alissa Cooper, Amy Winecoff, Tiffany Gillis Brown, Melodi Dinçer, Meetali Jain, Sarah Kay Wiley, Ravi Iyer

Designing the Technical Committee for the United States v. Google Search Antitrust Remedy

Report /

Designing the Technical Committee for the United States v. Google Search Antitrust Remedy

The Technical Committee is a key component of the remedies ordered in the US v. Google search antitrust case, intended to ensure effective implementation of court-ordered obligations and technical measures to promote competition in online search. KGI’s latest report provides a practical blueprint for the formation, structure, and operation of this independent body of experts.

Zander Arnao, Felix Chen, Alissa Cooper, Timothy Cowen, Joseph Jerome, Michael Kraver, Karina Montoya, Tracy Xu, Sophia Yakhno

KGI: 2025 Annual Report

Report /

KGI: 2025 Annual Report

In its first full year in operation, KGI made its mark across technology policy venues and outlets. Through expert-led, evidence-based work, KGI helped inform policy approaches to algorithmic feed design, researcher access to data, and competition enforcement in the search market – demonstrating how independent research can shape real-world decisions in the United States and Europe.

Close