Agentic Information Future

KGI’s Agentic Information Future initiative focuses on how AI agents are rapidly transforming the information ecosystem – from how information is produced and distributed to how it is discovered and consumed. The initiative explores the implications on information quality, market concentration, and media sustainability, while bringing together experts to generate empirical evidence and forward-looking analysis to inform debates spanning technology standardization and open source development, competition policy, and media policy.

The development of agentic AI creates the prospect for the internet’s de facto information gatekeepers – social media and search – to be seriously disrupted, if not replaced, by AI agents acting as the new information synthesizers. A world where news and knowledge is increasingly delivered to us proactively by personalized agents, rather than in response to our own searching or scrolling, raises fundamental questions about every aspect of information production, delivery, and consumption. 

Can we sustain the web as we’ve known it, where humans can continue to access news and knowledge directly from original sources, while growing an agentic web of high-quality information in parallel? Can technical and economic mechanisms be built into the agentic web to support better societal outcomes than what the advertising-supported, attention-maximizing web and mobile ecosystems have delivered? Against a backdrop of breathtaking accumulation of wealth in the hands of a small number of giant AI companies, can the design of nascent agentic AI markets build in protections against abuses of market power?

KGI’s Agentic Information Future initiative aims to address these pressing questions by convening experts and generating insights that respond to the rapidly evolving role of AI agents in the information ecosystem. The initiative is being designed to clarify this dynamic space and deliver empirical evidence and comprehensive analysis to inform technical and policy debates spanning technology standardization and open source development, competition policy, and media policy.

This initiative builds on KGI’s search competition work, which examines regulatory scrutiny of Google’s dominance and the implementation of competition enforcement regimes across different jurisdictions. Policy, technology, and business questions about nascent agentic information delivery paradigms are in many ways intertwined with market and enforcement dynamics in the search industry, while raising many novel considerations that extend beyond search 

As this initiative develops, KGI will convene experts, produce comprehensive analysis, and release practical resources to inform emerging debates on agentic AI policy and technology. Early outputs include:

Latest Work

Designing Technology Remedies: Lessons for Social Media and Generative AI Chatbot Litigation

Report /

Designing Technology Remedies: Lessons for Social Media and Generative AI Chatbot Litigation

As social media and generative AI chatbot lawsuits in the United States proceed to discovery and trial, courts are emerging as central actors in shaping technology governance, platform accountability, and online safety. A new report by the Knight-Georgetown Institute, Tech Justice Law, and the USC Marshall School Neely Center provides a practical, evidence-based framework to help courts, litigators, and policymakers craft effective and enforceable remedies for harms associated with social media platforms and AI chatbots.

Designing the Technical Committee for the United States v. Google Search Antitrust Remedy

Report /

Designing the Technical Committee for the United States v. Google Search Antitrust Remedy

The Technical Committee is a key component of the remedies ordered in the US v. Google search antitrust case, intended to ensure effective implementation of court-ordered obligations and technical measures to promote competition in online search. KGI’s latest report provides a practical blueprint for the formation, structure, and operation of this independent body of experts.

KGI: 2025 Annual Report

Report /

KGI: 2025 Annual Report

In its first full year in operation, KGI made its mark across technology policy venues and outlets. Through expert-led, evidence-based work, KGI helped inform policy approaches to algorithmic feed design, researcher access to data, and competition enforcement in the search market – demonstrating how independent research can shape real-world decisions in the United States and Europe.

Digital Competition Conference 2026: The Next Phase of Competition in Digital Markets

Commentary /

Digital Competition Conference 2026: The Next Phase of Competition in Digital Markets

This year’s Digital Competition Conference brought together researchers, policymakers, businesses, litigators, and civil society experts from over 37 countries to explore the latest lessons, challenges, and opportunities in regulating and enforcing competition in digital markets.

First Steps Toward Operationalizing Age Assurance Mandates: New York SAFE for Kids Act Proposed Rules

Commentary /

First Steps Toward Operationalizing Age Assurance Mandates: New York SAFE for Kids Act Proposed Rules

As governments around the world move to require age assurance online, attention is growing around whether and how these mechanisms can be implemented accurately and effectively. Recently proposed rules from the New York Office of the Attorney General represent the most significant effort to date by a US public authority to operationalize an age assurance mandate. KGI’s comments on the proposed rules recommend improvements to make them more technically sound and to better account for privacy and service availability.

How the European Commission Can Strengthen Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act

Commentary /

How the European Commission Can Strengthen Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act

As the European Commission launches its first-ever statutory review of the Digital Markets Act, KGI’s Alissa Cooper and Tracy Xu joined with a group of European and American scholars to provide a critical assessment of how the regime has performed thus far and  recommendations for how implementation can be strengthened.

See All Work

Close