Platform Governance

KGI’s work on platform governance addresses how platform design choices shape user behavior, risks, and societal outcomes. KGI works across policy contexts with independent researchers, civil society partners, industry experts, litigators, and journalists to inform the development of online platform accountability, transparency, and regulation.

 

KGI’s platform governance work focuses on platform design in policy and industry, platform design litigation, and public data access.

Platform Design in Policy and Industry

Each day, billions of users use online tech platforms or scroll through social media feeds, search results, and streaming recommendations that shape what they see, read, and watch. The design of these online platforms, including their algorithmic feeds, influence how users experience the online information environment and determine what users see, wielding enormous influence over users’ online experiences and, increasingly, their lives offline. 

Federal, state, and global policymakers have proposed and adopted a variety of approaches to regulate platform designs and their impacts, from strengthening transparency and user control of algorithmic feeds to addressing deceptive design features or requiring age verification. The maturation of policymaking in this area requires bolstering scientific consensus about which platform design changes effectively mitigate which harms, how to understand the tradeoffs, how to best measure and evaluate design changes, and other questions. 

KGI is working to deepen research-to-policy connections and convene stakeholders in support of this agenda. Learn more about our work on platform design in policy and industry here.

Platform Design Litigation

Litigation is a battleground for platform accountability around the world. Lawsuits across US states now target the design choices behind online platforms – from extended use designs and algorithmic manipulation to privacy violations. Many of these cases employ legal theories grounded in consumer protection and product liability to attempt to make platforms answerable for the design of their products. As US lawsuits advance to critical discovery and remedy phases, there is a growing need to foster collaboration between three communities whose work sits at the intersection of platform design and the law: litigators, technology researchers, and legal scholars. 

KGI has two litigation-oriented projects: Litigating Platform Design and Empirical Research in Tech Litigation. Learn more about our work on platform design litigation here

Public Data Access 

Access to public data about online discourse – the reach of viral posts, the connections between social media accounts, and so much more – is essential for accountability and informed public conversations.  Public data access enables independent research and investigation, informs evidence-based policymaking, and advances collective understanding about the role of online platforms in our lives. 

Thanks to transparency advocates, we have seen various transparency regimes take hold – voluntary, self-regulatory, and regulatory – requiring platforms to share information about their activities, algorithms, and processes with vetted entities including researchers, regulators, or business competitors, and sometimes with the broader public. Other organizations, companies, and researchers have developed automated tools to independently collect and analyze public platform data.

Yet the tools that once allowed researchers, journalists, and civil society to study platforms are disappearing, undermining transparency and accountability. Platforms restrict researcher access while public data is monetized for advertisers, data brokers, and AI training. This imbalance – where companies profit but independent researchers are left in the dark – undermines transparency and weakens oversight.

KGI advances efforts to expand public access to public platform data, drawing on the research community’s experience with platform datasets to push for practical and policy changes that improve transparency and accountability. Learn more about our work on public data access here.

Latest Work

What US Lawsuits Reveal About Platform Design That DSA Reports Don’t

Commentary /

What US Lawsuits Reveal About Platform Design That DSA Reports Don’t

TikTok’s and Meta’s 2025 DSA risk assessments describe a range of risks and a multitude of mitigations addressing risks to minors: screentime management, parental controls, privacy-oriented design defaults, and restrictions on notifications. However, the risk assessments provide very little information about the level of risks and the effectiveness of chosen mitigations. Internal company documents released in US litigation, on the other hand, tell a different story.

Measuring Risk: What EU Risk Assessments and US Litigation Reveal About Meta and TikTok

Report /

Measuring Risk: What EU Risk Assessments and US Litigation Reveal About Meta and TikTok

Across the EU and US, two influential digital governance regimes are producing new evidence about how large social media companies assess and respond to potential risks on their platforms. KGI’s latest report compares Meta and TikTok’s EU risk assessments with internal documents emerging from US litigation, revealing significant gaps between public claims about risk mitigation and evidence of how these risks are actually addressed.

Age Assurance Online: A Technical Assessment of Current Systems and their Limitations

Report /

Age Assurance Online: A Technical Assessment of Current Systems and their Limitations

Governments around the world are adopting online age assurance requirements of different kinds, reshaping how digital services are accessed by adults and youth. KGI’s latest report provides a technical assessment of how age assurance systems work in practice and examines their accuracy, circumvention resistance, availability, and privacy implications.

Bringing Better Feeds to Life

Commentary /

Bringing Better Feeds to Life

Algorithms determine what we read, watch, and encounter online, and, increasingly, they also influence our offline lives. Yet algorithms are often built to maximize short-term engagement and capture attention, rather than to deliver long-term value to users. KGI’s new commentary takes a deep dive into the evolving landscape of recommender system design, highlighting six innovative trends that show it is possible to design better feeds that put people first.

Introducing Model Legislation for Better Algorithmic Feeds

Model Text /

Introducing Model Legislation for Better Algorithmic Feeds

Model legislation published by the Knight-Georgetown Institute provides a pathway for lawmakers who want to encourage better algorithmic feeds that put users’ interests front and center.

Seeing the Digital Sphere: The Case for Public Platform Data

Commentary /

Seeing the Digital Sphere: The Case for Public Platform Data

Should we be able to understand the risks kids face online? Understand how brands communicate with consumers? How politicians communicate online? These questions – and many more – can only be answered when public platform data is accessible. A new series by Tech Policy Press and the Knight-Georgetown Institute explores why public platform data matters, what threats researchers and journalists face trying to access this data, and how we can build a more transparent digital public sphere.

See All From Platform Governance

Close