Search Competition

KGI’s work on search competition brings together experts from across economics, technology, law, and business to help advance and inform interventions to restore competition in the digital search market. Our work examines both high-profile antitrust litigation in the US and the development of novel ex-ante regulatory frameworks in Europe and the UK.

Search engines shape how billions of people find and access information and what voices get heard online. Google Search – the world’s dominant search engine – has faced mounting regulatory scrutiny and enforcement actions around the world over its anti-competitive practices designed to preserve its dominance across the web and devices. Search is a complex market where designing effective interventions requires grappling with questions related to large-scale data collection, advances in AI and other technological inputs, relationships with adjacent markets in mobile and on the web, and consumer behavior and decision-making in the market.

KGI’s work on search competition is focused on seeding and creating intellectual foundations for effective interventions amidst this complexity. Our work examines both high-profile antitrust litigation in the US and the development of novel ex-ante regulatory frameworks in Europe and the UK. 

We convene experts from across economics, technology, law, and business to produce novel insights. We also produce our own technical analyses. Key outputs have included: 

  • Considerations for Effective Search Competition Remedies, a 2024 report aimed at informing the design of remedies in the U.S. v. Google search antitrust litigation. The report synthesized the results of the Future of Search Competition Workshop, a private convening of experts focused on search.
  • The Technical Feasibility of Divesting Google Chrome, an in-depth technical report published in 2025 examining how a Chrome divestiture could be structured for success and demonstrating that an independent Chrome browser could effectively compete with other major browsers.

Latest Work

Seeing the Digital Sphere: The Case for Public Platform Data

Commentary /

Seeing the Digital Sphere: The Case for Public Platform Data

Should we be able to understand the risks kids face online? Understand how brands communicate with consumers? How politicians communicate online? These questions – and many more – can only be answered when public platform data is accessible. A new series by Tech Policy Press and the Knight-Georgetown Institute explores why public platform data matters, what threats researchers and journalists face trying to access this data, and how we can build a more transparent digital public sphere.

Better Access: Data for the Common Good

Report /

Better Access: Data for the Common Good

Online platforms shape what we know, how we connect, and who gets heard. As critical conversations unfold publicly on digital platforms, the ability to study them at scale has steadily diminished. KGI’s latest report authored by a distinguished group of leaders from research, civil society, and journalism offers a roadmap for expanding access to high-influence public platform data – the narrow slice of public platform data that has the greatest impact on civic life due to its reach, source, or role in shaping what people see online.

Without a Payment Ban, What Can We Expect from the US v. Google Data Sharing Remedies?

Commentary /

Without a Payment Ban, What Can We Expect from the US v. Google Data Sharing Remedies?

On September 2, US District Court Judge Amit Mehta issued an opinion that many in the tech industry had been waiting on for more than 15 years: a ruling about how to rectify Google’s maintenance of its illegal monopoly in online search. The most consequential aspect of the opinion is that the remedies will not meaningfully address the conduct at the center of the case: Google paying distributors like Apple, Samsung, and Mozilla tens of billions of dollars per year to lock in Google Search as the default on nearly every mobile phone and across much of the desktop browser market.

Curbing Google’s Dominance: The UK’s First Test of Its New Digital Competition Powers

Commentary /

Curbing Google’s Dominance: The UK’s First Test of Its New Digital Competition Powers

The UK Competition and Markets Authority has provisionally designated Google as having Strategic Market Status – a  step toward curbing the company’s dominance in online search. The Knight-Georgetown Institute finds evidence to support this designation and urges the UK to prioritize stronger interventions that address key barriers to entry in the search market.

Europe Unveils New Evidence-Based Guidelines to Advance Safer Platform Design for Minors

Commentary /

Europe Unveils New Evidence-Based Guidelines to Advance Safer Platform Design for Minors

The European Commission’s new guidelines to protect minors online mark a step forward in online child safety, offering recommendations for how platforms are designed, including limits on manipulative design techniques, defaults to maximize protection, more agency for children, and regular risk reviews.

Robust Google Search Antitrust Remedies for an Uncertain AI Future

Commentary /

Robust Google Search Antitrust Remedies for an Uncertain AI Future

Robust and comprehensive remedies in the US government’s Google search antitrust case would help prevent Google from leveraging its monopoly power in search to dominate the emerging market for generative AI products.

See All Work

Close