Research & Commentary

Issue

Type

9 results for:
Ofcom Call for Evidence: Researchers’ access to information from regulated online services

Commentary /

Ofcom Call for Evidence: Researchers’ access to information from regulated online services

The Knight-Georgetown Institute (KGI) submitted comments to the United Kingdom regulator for communications services’ (Ofcom) call for evidence on researcher access to information from digital platforms. KGI’s comments highlight barriers to independent research and practical steps that Ofcom can take to strengthen access to data and independent research in the online information ecosystem.

Leticia Bode, Peter Chapman

Advancing Platform Accountability: The Promise and Perils of DSA Risk Assessments

Commentary /

Advancing Platform Accountability: The Promise and Perils of DSA Risk Assessments

Late last year, the public got its first glimpse into one of the EU Digital Services Act’s (DSA) key governance tools. Nineteen designated Very Large Online Platforms and Search Engines (VLOPs and VLOSEs) published systemic risk assessment and audit reports focusing on platform risks and mitigation measures.

The DSA’s required risk assessments and audits create the possibility to advance groundbreaking platform transparency and accountability, but this first round falls far short of realizing that potential.

Peter Chapman

Laying the Foundation for Independent Platform Data Access in the EU

Commentary /

Laying the Foundation for Independent Platform Data Access in the EU

KGI recently submitted comments to the European Commission on its draft Delegated Act on vetted researcher data access, highlighting the connection between vetted access and public access to data, offering  recommendations for specific additional categories of data and research that could be enabled under the Act, and underlying the need to understand systemic risks both across platforms and across borders.

Peter Chapman

Considerations for Effective Search Competition Remedies

Commentary /

Considerations for Effective Search Competition Remedies

A report articulating foundational principles for crafting effective remedies in US v Google, including the need for a multi-faceted remedy package, an inclusive understanding of search access points, the combination of structural and behavioral remedies, and robust oversight with quick adjustments as needed.

Alissa Cooper, Zander Arnao

Close